During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用。Line官方版本下载对此有专业解读
。搜狗输入法2026是该领域的重要参考
What is helping them meet these deadlines is the industry's alacrity in embracing generative AI. We watched two editors at Vigloo's headquarters in Seoul's Gangnam district create a 30-minute film using only generative AI.
不仅如此，Kimi K2.5模型还成为了现象级产品OpenClaw的官方推荐模型，其调用量在OpenClaw的模型调用榜中排名第一，甚至超过了GPT、Claude这些海外头部模型。，更多细节参见同城约会
Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today's Strands.